Some Easter Thoughts On Friday…

2009 April 10
by agathos

And remember, no one who wants to do wrong should ever say, “God is tempting me.” God is never tempted to do wrong and he never tempts anyone else either. Temptation comes from the lure of our own evil desires. These evil desires lead to evil actions and evil actions lead to death. So don’t be misled, my dear brothers and sisters. Whatever is good and perfect comes to us from God above, who created all heaven’s lights.  Unlike them, he never changes or casts shifting shadows. ~ James 1:13-17

When it comes to the events that we celebrate as Easter it seems to me that some people have a very deterministic understanding of the events and motives, and they are more certain of this position than I believe they should be.  Their position–and I realize this is a bit of a characterization but it is a blog post–is basically that God is the puppet master orchestrating the events of the cross so prophecy will be fulfilled and the sins of the world can be taken away.  From this position I would like to consider a few questions: Did God orchestrate the events of the cross?  Did He harden and turn the hearts of Judas, the Romans and the Pharisees against Jesus so that they would commit the act that would forever change our relationship with Him?  Did He cause people to sin to erase all sin? As Jesus was showing incredible restraint throughout the events that we celebrate as Easter, was the Father on a spiritual plane using his power to manipulate events?

Perhaps, you might disagree with me (you would be wrong of course ;) ) but I believe that neither God nor Jesus had to do anything to make the cross happen other than show up.  They were well aware of the sinful nature of fallen man and what was really in their hearts.

God did not need to prompt the Romans who crucified tens of thousands of people to crucify Jesus.  Their sin and hatred and violence needed no urging from God to actualize itself, they were expressing it every day.  The streets that led to the entrance of a city conquered by the Romans were often lined on both sides with crucifixes.  Hanging on those crosses were people in all states of decomposition which were there to install more fear in their terror rule.   They had no problem beating Jesus, humiliating him, shaming him, and dehumanizing him: they did these sorts of thing every day.  But here’s the point: that was the sin in their own heart expressing itself as it had time and time again not God acting on or through them.

The Temple authorities and Judean elite whose entire existence was structured around a certain religious disposition needed no prompting from God to their sin.   They had ingrained that sin habit and behavior into themselves for a very long time.   Their hatred and hand in Jesus’ murder had nothing to do with God orchestrating events.  Their part in these events is a revelation of their hearts, their sin and their self-righteousness.

Judas is much easier.  While I think it obvious that some of his actions are a reflection of the sin nature in him the scriptures say that the devil entered into him spurring him to action.   I’m not sure exactly what that means, but I think it is clear that God did not have a hand in Judas’ part.

Did God orchestrate the events of the cross?  Does the ends justify the means for God?  Did he use sin to kill his son to atone for mankind?  No, I think the truly shattering thing about the God revealed in Jesus is that he knew the fallen nature of man.  He knew the depraved secret corners of their hearts, and even knowing how sinful, fallen, self-glorifying, self-righteous creatures would react to a sinless, God glorifying and righteous person, he still decided to empty himself of glory and take on the nature of man.

Jesus knew that man would express his fallen sinful nature and treat him unjustly but he accepted that because he wanted to make us just.  He knew he would be treated unmercifully but accepted that because he wanted to show us mercy.  He was well aware that people would shame him and treat him ungracefully but he accepted that because he wanted to redeem us and show us grace.  He accepted all these things knowing everything about man, knowing the worst that man would do to him without any prompting whatsoever, so that then in a great reversal as men tried to cause him death he could instead give them life.

He knew our hearts.   He knew how people would react towards him and what would eventually happen.  Still, knowing this, he drew into himself the worst; the very worst that depraved humanity could create, and he did all this so that he could redeem us to the very best that God could create.

The sin was ours; the expression of that sin was ours.  The wisdom was his.  The work was his.  The glory is his. Forever and ever.

Amen!!!

4 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 April 11

    Jeez, Scott.

    I mean, you’re usually right on, man, but you’re wa-a-a-ay off on this one. I mean, you’re erong almost right from the start of your commentary:

    God did not need to prompt the Romans who crucified tens of thousands of people to crucify Jesus. Their sin and hatred and violence needed no urging from God to actualize itself, they were expressing it every day. The streets that led to the entrance of a city conquered by the Romans were often lined on both sides with crucifixes…. They had no problem beating Jesus, humiliating him, shaming him, and dehumanizing him: they did these sorts of thing every day.

    Haven’t you seen Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ? Pilate didn’t want to torture and crucify Jim Caviezel– I mean, Jesus. He had no choice! I mean, he couldn’t even stop it when Bruce Willis’ wife from The Sixth Sense (or the boss lady from that Dollhouse show on Fox; I think that’s the same chick) begged him to, Claudia or whatever her name was… (Clarice? No, that was a different movie) And the dude that looks kinda like a younger, short-haired Nick Nolte in 48 Hours–you know, the one that was directing the whipping–he wasn’t exactly enjoying it. (Tho’ I’ll give you that the dudes doing the beating were)

    I mean, you really need some more perspective on the whole Roman soldiers thing, man. Heck, I don’t even read the crucifixion accounts in the Gospels anymore.

    Watching The Passion is a heck of a lot easier, and it has way more details than the Bible, anyways.

    Lighten up, man!
    ;)

  2. 2009 April 12
    Jake permalink

    And the award for most pop culture references in a single comment on a… *cough* “Biblical Studies” blog, goes to…

    Dude, the only way that could have been any better is if you could’ve somehow managed to fit Kevin Bacon in there somehow.

    Go ahead. Impress me.

    • 2009 April 16

      Well, it’s kind of hard when you put me on the spot like that, and with you staring so expectantly at me…

      So what was the deal with the “pouring out of the Spirit” on Pentecost, anyway? Maybe Gibson will come out with a sequel–you know, after his divorce is final–maybe The Passion of the Christ II: This time, it’s personal!. It could have Col Tom Ryan (playing Saul of Tarsus) transforming from a Pharisee to a Christian like the T-1000. Peter (WWE’s Kain?) could lay the smackdown on Ananias and Sapphira on the Temple steps. The cast of Rent could be the flamers believers speaking in tongues, with Kevin Bacon from Hollow Man (minus the CG wang, I’d hope) as the Holy Spirit running around and spreading sublime joy among them. Throw in a big musical finale ala The Life of Brian, and it’s sure to be a box office smash, no?

  3. 2009 April 17
    Jake permalink

    Brian FTW.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS