<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scotteriology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>For Those That Don't Take Themselves Seriously</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Is Not Your Boyfriend by Michael B</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/jesus-is-not-your-boyfriend/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2563#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>What are you thinking of when you say theologian? I&#039;m assuming a dusty old bearded man who reads dusty old books in foreign languages by dusty old bearded men who died hundreds of years ago. A very boring academic, in other words. (With apologies to all of the readers of this blog within academia.) I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d want to listen something someone like that wrote, either.

But here&#039;s the thing: everyone&#039;s a theologian. It&#039;s just that a lot of people have really crappy theology. Artists and songwriters just need to have better theology, and a lot of them don&#039;t. And that&#039;s not necessarily their fault. The church as a whole just needs to do a better job teaching theology to laypeople.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you thinking of when you say theologian? I&#8217;m assuming a dusty old bearded man who reads dusty old books in foreign languages by dusty old bearded men who died hundreds of years ago. A very boring academic, in other words. (With apologies to all of the readers of this blog within academia.) I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to listen something someone like that wrote, either.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing: everyone&#8217;s a theologian. It&#8217;s just that a lot of people have really crappy theology. Artists and songwriters just need to have better theology, and a lot of them don&#8217;t. And that&#8217;s not necessarily their fault. The church as a whole just needs to do a better job teaching theology to laypeople.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Is Not Your Boyfriend by liza</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/jesus-is-not-your-boyfriend/#comment-5107</link>
		<dc:creator>liza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2563#comment-5107</guid>
		<description>Yeah. Theologians writing worship songs.  I can just imagine how incredible that would be.

*yawn*

There must be a certain amount of emotion accessible in worship.  Perhaps this song goes to far. I wonder if the sexualizing of the lyrics is done on the part of the listener instead of on the part of the writer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Theologians writing worship songs.  I can just imagine how incredible that would be.</p>
<p>*yawn*</p>
<p>There must be a certain amount of emotion accessible in worship.  Perhaps this song goes to far. I wonder if the sexualizing of the lyrics is done on the part of the listener instead of on the part of the writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What RBL Should Be Like II&#8230; by willohroots</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/what-rbl-should-be-like-ii/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>willohroots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2566#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>Such honesty is rare, but refreshing.  I have actually taken some books out back and shot them, is that a book review?  Something that wasted my precious time with not purpose had to eat lead.  Do I have a future at RBL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such honesty is rare, but refreshing.  I have actually taken some books out back and shot them, is that a book review?  Something that wasted my precious time with not purpose had to eat lead.  Do I have a future at RBL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Is Not Your Boyfriend by Jake</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/jesus-is-not-your-boyfriend/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2563#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, Frank, I like the cut of your jib...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, Frank, I like the cut of your jib&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Is Not Your Boyfriend by Jake</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/jesus-is-not-your-boyfriend/#comment-5103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2563#comment-5103</guid>
		<description>This is why I am adamant that the church needs fewer artists and poets writing our words of worship and more educated and passionate theologians. 

I also think some people need to get laid more often... [/tongue in cheek]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I am adamant that the church needs fewer artists and poets writing our words of worship and more educated and passionate theologians. </p>
<p>I also think some people need to get laid more often&#8230; [/tongue in cheek]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Is Not Your Boyfriend by Frank Emanuel</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/jesus-is-not-your-boyfriend/#comment-5102</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Emanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2563#comment-5102</guid>
		<description>An interesting study on this topic is a particularly uncomfortable period of Moravian history under the leadership of Zinzendorf. There are extremes in the pietist rejection of stuffy intellectual religion, as is evidenced in this song. But there is also a disconnection songs devoid of emotion or the language of intimacy. It&#039;s a bit of a struggle and what is needed really a partnering of theologians and songwriters. 

I blogged a bit on this, riffing on your post. I must admit that the whole way you critique modern worship is uncomfortable for me - I love intimate worship. But I&#039;m also uncomfortable with a lot of what passes for worship songs these days. My big contention with this song is trying to express intimacy yet referencing God in a gendered third person - that doesn&#039;t work for me. I&#039;d be the one singing she half the time (but I&#039;d probably not sing this song, I&#039;m picky about what songs I sing in congregational settings - which is probably why I am most comfortable with a guitar strapped on).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting study on this topic is a particularly uncomfortable period of Moravian history under the leadership of Zinzendorf. There are extremes in the pietist rejection of stuffy intellectual religion, as is evidenced in this song. But there is also a disconnection songs devoid of emotion or the language of intimacy. It&#8217;s a bit of a struggle and what is needed really a partnering of theologians and songwriters. </p>
<p>I blogged a bit on this, riffing on your post. I must admit that the whole way you critique modern worship is uncomfortable for me &#8211; I love intimate worship. But I&#8217;m also uncomfortable with a lot of what passes for worship songs these days. My big contention with this song is trying to express intimacy yet referencing God in a gendered third person &#8211; that doesn&#8217;t work for me. I&#8217;d be the one singing she half the time (but I&#8217;d probably not sing this song, I&#8217;m picky about what songs I sing in congregational settings &#8211; which is probably why I am most comfortable with a guitar strapped on).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst Christian Song Ever by Jake</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/worst-christian-song-ever/#comment-5101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2556#comment-5101</guid>
		<description>J, Pete, Im going to Christian side hug you to death. Also, how many posts in this blog are going to be titled &quot;Worst Song Ever&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J, Pete, Im going to Christian side hug you to death. Also, how many posts in this blog are going to be titled &#8220;Worst Song Ever&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst Creation Story Ever by Gary Simmons</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/worst-creation-story-ever/#comment-5100</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2551#comment-5100</guid>
		<description>Half an hour later... still laughing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half an hour later&#8230; still laughing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst Christian Song Ever by Gary Simmons</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/worst-christian-song-ever/#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2556#comment-5099</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t know, Brian. Maybe get rid of all the ones who don&#039;t know Scripture, then ... oh. Yeah, I guess you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t know, Brian. Maybe get rid of all the ones who don&#8217;t know Scripture, then &#8230; oh. Yeah, I guess you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst Preacher Ever 2009 by Michael</title>
		<link>http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/worst-preacher-ever-2009/#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/?p=2350#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>Gary, I believe they did search his vehicle because he makes statements on his website about them tearing his car apart.  All this idiot needed to do was co operate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I believe they did search his vehicle because he makes statements on his website about them tearing his car apart.  All this idiot needed to do was co operate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
